<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>US Cellular &#8211; steeltreepartners</title>
	<atom:link href="https://steeltreepartners.com/tag/us-cellular/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://steeltreepartners.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:31:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>From Four and a Half to Three: How 2025 Reshapes Cell Tower Ownership</title>
		<link>https://steeltreepartners.com/how-2025-reshapes-tower-ownership/</link>
					<comments>https://steeltreepartners.com/how-2025-reshapes-tower-ownership/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Schmidt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 09:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Tower Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DISH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Cellular]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://steeltreepartners.com/?p=3923</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In 2025, the U.S. wireless industry appears to be effectively consolidating from four national carriers and one major regional carrier down to three. That shift is not just a headline—it marks a fundamental change for tower owners, landowners, and leaseholders. Two major deals—T-Mobile’s acquisition of U.S. Cellular’s assets and AT&#38;T’s pending purchase of DISH’s spectrum—have [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-start="267" data-end="696">In 2025, the U.S. wireless industry appears to be effectively consolidating from four national carriers and one major regional carrier down to three. That shift is not just a headline—it marks a fundamental change for tower owners, landowners, and leaseholders. Two major deals—T-Mobile’s acquisition of U.S. Cellular’s assets and AT&amp;T’s pending purchase of DISH’s spectrum—have redefined what “growth” means in the tower sector.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="wp-image-362 size-large" style="-webkit-user-drag: none; display: inline-block; margin-bottom: -1ex;" src="https://steeltreepartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/reshape-cell-tower-ownership.png" alt="" width="840" height="630" /></p>
<h3 data-start="701" data-end="769">T-Mobile’s Acquisition of U.S. Cellular: The First Piece to Fall</h3>
<p data-start="771" data-end="1027">T-Mobile moved first, announcing in mid-2024 that it would acquire much of U.S. Cellular’s spectrum and subscribers. U.S. Cellular retained ownership of roughly 4,400 towers, while T-Mobile agreed to lease space on about 2,600 of them under a 15-year deal.</p>
<p data-start="1029" data-end="1336">For tower owners, the deal was a double-edged sword. On one hand, it preserved lease continuity for sites T-Mobile decides to keep from the U.S. Cellular network. On the other hand, it removed another independent carrier from the market, potentially hindering growth in collocation and amendment activities.</p>
<p data-start="1338" data-end="1515">Fortunately, U.S. Cellular focused on owning and building its own towers rather than collocating, so the loss of U.S. Cellular won’t have a measurable impact on future lease-up.</p>
<p data-start="1517" data-end="1780">Unfortunately, for tower owners that do have U.S. Cellular as a tenant, there is a higher-than-average probability that they will eventually terminate. While some sites may be kept by T-Mobile if there are no T-Mobile sites in the area, most will not be retained.</p>
<p data-start="1782" data-end="1882">The transaction reinforced what many in the industry already sensed: consolidation was accelerating.</p>
<h3 data-start="1887" data-end="1925">DISH’s Exit: There Goes the Bishop</h3>
<p data-start="1927" data-end="2185">DISH’s path was more drawn out but is likely to end with the same conclusion. After years of struggling to scale its wireless ambitions, DISH (via Echostar) has opted to sell its 600 MHz and 3.45 GHz spectrum holdings—valued at roughly $22.7 billion—to AT&amp;T.</p>
<p data-start="2187" data-end="2469">A subsequent deal with SpaceX has Echostar transferring its AWS-3 spectrum to SpaceX. These two deals will effectively end DISH’s run as a facilities-based carrier and transfer valuable mid- and low-band spectrum to AT&amp;T and SpaceX. (There may be more spectrum transfers coming up.)</p>
<p data-start="2471" data-end="2768">DISH’s 24,000-site buildout between 2020 and 2024 represented nearly 60%–70% of all new macrocells constructed in the U.S. during that period. In other words, DISH alone accounted for a substantial portion of the “same tower” growth. That surge provided temporary tailwinds for the tower industry.</p>
<p data-start="2770" data-end="3005">Many DISH-related leases are vulnerable to termination in the near term, though very few have been terminated to date. The spectrum sales by Echostar are still pending regulatory approval; therefore, most leases continue as is—for now.</p>
<p data-start="3007" data-end="3157">Still, tower buyers are already pricing in future risk: DISH leases are valued at a fraction of comparable agreements with AT&amp;T, Verizon, or T-Mobile.</p>
<p data-start="3159" data-end="3448">To add insult to injury, DISH has sent letters to some tower owners indicating that they believe they are “excused” from their lease obligations due to “frustration of purpose,” alleging that because the FCC pushed them to sell spectrum, they are no longer obligated to pay lease payments.</p>
<p data-start="3450" data-end="3715">AT&amp;T’s spectrum acquisition, once approved, isn’t likely to trigger a surge in new tower builds. Instead, most of that spectrum will be deployed through amendments on existing AT&amp;T sites—offering incremental but modest rent increases for landlords and tower owners.</p>
<p data-start="3717" data-end="3853">SpaceX is unlikely to build a significant terrestrial network. The broader impact is one of consolidation and efficiency, not expansion.</p>
<p data-start="3855" data-end="4005">Together, T-Mobile’s U.S. Cellular deal and AT&amp;T’s pending DISH spectrum acquisition complete the long-feared contraction of the U.S. wireless market.</p>
<h3 data-start="4010" data-end="4056">What It Means for Tower Owners and Lessors</h3>
<p data-start="4058" data-end="4152">The move from four national carriers to three fundamentally reshapes the tower business model.</p>
<p data-start="4154" data-end="4366">• <strong data-start="4156" data-end="4180">Less organic growth:</strong> With fewer carriers competing for coverage, the number of new colocation opportunities has shrunk. Tower owners can no longer count on new amendment activity from DISH or U.S. Cellular.</p>
<p data-start="4368" data-end="4526">• <strong data-start="4370" data-end="4390">Near-term churn:</strong> Expect that many DISH and U.S. Cellular agreements will be terminated in the coming years, especially once FCC approvals are finalized.</p>
<p data-start="4528" data-end="4640">• <strong data-start="4530" data-end="4557">Reduction of valuation:</strong> DISH and U.S. Cellular agreements are already being discounted due to uncertainty.</p>
<p data-start="4642" data-end="4777">• <strong data-start="4644" data-end="4666">Shift in leverage:</strong> The remaining carriers hold greater negotiating power, which may push down renewal rates and rent escalations.</p>
<p data-start="4779" data-end="5025">• <strong data-start="4781" data-end="4801">Valuation reset:</strong> Investors are recalibrating expectations, applying slightly lower multiples for tower asset purchases and prioritizing AT&amp;T, Verizon, and T-Mobile tenancy. Scarcity of available tower assets is helping keep valuations high.</p>
<p data-start="5027" data-end="5161">• <strong data-start="5029" data-end="5053">More predictability:</strong> With three major participants left, the risk of further consolidation—and future churn—drops significantly.</p>
<p data-start="5163" data-end="5370">For tower owners, the next phase isn’t about adding tenants. It’s about protecting value, optimizing existing leases, reducing costs, pursuing non-traditional tenants, and maximizing amendment opportunities.</p>
<h3 data-start="5375" data-end="5404">Looking at the Chessboard</h3>
<p data-start="5406" data-end="5590">As the dust settles, 2025 marks a turning point for the tower industry. The sector is shifting from an era of carrier-driven expansion to one of consolidation and strategic management.</p>
<p data-start="5592" data-end="5777">Owners who proactively audit their leases, strengthen relationships with core tenants, aggressively seek tertiary tenants, and position their assets for amendment income will fare best.</p>
<p data-start="5779" data-end="6036">Let’s be clear: the tower business is still a great business. But the absurdly high-growth years may be behind us, and the margin for error is smaller. Proper site selection is more important than ever, and active site management and marketing are critical.</p>
<p data-start="6038" data-end="6191">If you’re a tower owner and want to discuss the state of the industry or how we can help your tower business succeed, we’d be delighted to hear from you.</p>
<h3 data-start="6196" data-end="6239">Time to Take Your Pieces Off the Table?</h3>
<p data-start="6241" data-end="6498">For tower owners, this consolidation wave isn’t just an industry headline—it’s a signal to reassess strategy. Whether you’re holding assets long-term or considering a sale, understanding how these shifts affect tower valuations and buyer demand is critical.</p>
<p data-start="6500" data-end="6541">That’s where SteelTree Partners comes in.</p>
<p data-start="6543" data-end="6688">Most brokers put out a memo and step back, leaving you to handle questions, due diligence, and tough buyer conversations. That’s not how we work.</p>
<p data-start="6693" data-end="6740"><strong>Here’s how SteelTree Partners stands apart:</strong></p>
<p data-start="6742" data-end="7302">✅ We stay involved until closing—no disappearing acts.<br data-start="6796" data-end="6799" />✅ We visit towers when it makes sense to fully understand the assets.<br data-start="6868" data-end="6871" />✅ We help prepare due diligence and review it beforehand to avoid surprises.<br data-start="6947" data-end="6950" />✅ No “preferred buyers”—you get full market exposure.<br data-start="7003" data-end="7006" />✅ We’ve owned and operated towers and negotiated thousands of leases.<br data-start="7075" data-end="7078" />✅ We take time to understand your portfolio and objectives.<br data-start="7137" data-end="7140" />✅ We handle everything from single-tower deals to large portfolios.<br data-start="7207" data-end="7210" />✅ Two decades of trusted experience.<br data-start="7246" data-end="7249" />✅ We help owners even before they formally engage us.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://steeltreepartners.com/how-2025-reshapes-tower-ownership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q1: How Many Carriers Should I Really Build For? The 3-Carrier Reality of 2026.</title>
		<link>https://steeltreepartners.com/how-many-carriers-should-i-build-for/</link>
					<comments>https://steeltreepartners.com/how-many-carriers-should-i-build-for/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Schmidt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 17:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Tower Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DISH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tower developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Cellular]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://steeltreepartners.com/?p=3860</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[With DISH and UScellular out of the picture, we&#8217;re back to three national carriers. For tower owners, that changes the math on how much steel you need in the ground. The old rule was simple: build for four carriers. But that was before the market consolidated and before 5G got deployed. Now? Most new builds [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="3860" class="elementor elementor-3860" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-18e57cf e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="18e57cf" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-dee9c80 elementor-widget elementor-widget-image" data-id="dee9c80" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="image.default">
																<a href="https://steeltreepartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Three-Carrier-Tower-Design.png" data-elementor-open-lightbox="yes" data-elementor-lightbox-title="Three Carrier Tower Design" data-elementor-lightbox-description="Illustration of three carriers  design for towers" data-e-action-hash="#elementor-action%3Aaction%3Dlightbox%26settings%3DeyJpZCI6Mzg4MiwidXJsIjoiaHR0cHM6XC9cL3N0ZWVsdHJlZXBhcnRuZXJzLmNvbVwvd3AtY29udGVudFwvdXBsb2Fkc1wvMjAyNlwvMDJcL1RocmVlLUNhcnJpZXItVG93ZXItRGVzaWduLnBuZyJ9">
							<img decoding="async" width="768" height="768" src="https://steeltreepartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Three-Carrier-Tower-Design-768x768.png" class="attachment-medium_large size-medium_large wp-image-3882" alt="Graphic of Three Carrier Tower Design" srcset="https://steeltreepartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Three-Carrier-Tower-Design-768x768.png 768w, https://steeltreepartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Three-Carrier-Tower-Design-300x300.png 300w, https://steeltreepartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Three-Carrier-Tower-Design-150x150.png 150w, https://steeltreepartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Three-Carrier-Tower-Design.png 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />								</a>
															</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-33d94c9 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="33d94c9" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
									<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">With DISH and UScellular out of the picture, we&#8217;re back to three national carriers. For tower owners, that changes the math on how much steel you need in the ground.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The old rule was simple: build for four carriers. But that was before the market consolidated and before 5G got deployed. Now? Most new builds can safely spec for three full carrier arrays &#8211; but there&#8217;s nuance here.</span></p><h2><b>5G Changed the Loading Game</b></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The heavy lifting is done. The initial 5G rollout meant massive MIMO panels and tons of radio equipment. But we&#8217;re seeing the profile shift now &#8211; newer mid-band antennas are shrinking in wind load (shorter, narrower, or both) even as they&#8217;re getting heavier. More RRUs, more integrated antennas. The constant cycle of loading and rent increases with every amendment? That&#8217;s slowing down, though it&#8217;s not dead yet. </span></p><h2><b>When to Overbuild (and When Not To)</b></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Even with steel and construction costs where they are, I&#8217;m still generally telling people to overspec capacity. Why? Because if you ever plan to sell, that extra structural capacity is almost always accretive to your exit price. Buyers don&#8217;t want to mod towers &#8211; and if they have to, they&#8217;ll discount your price to cover it. That upfront steel cost might sting, but it&#8217;s usually cheaper than the haircut you&#8217;ll take at exit.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">There are exceptions:</span></p><ul><li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">If you&#8217;re near existing towers with capacity</span></li><li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Very rural areas where a second or third carrier is statistically unlikely.</span></li></ul><div> </div><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">For most builds, three full 5G arrays is the sweet spot. In rural areas, throw 1-2 six-foot microwave dishes into your loading calc just to be safe.</span></p>								</div>
					</div>
				</div>
		<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-a26a491 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="a26a491" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-2754109 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading" data-id="2754109" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="heading.default">
					<h2 class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">Add Your Heading Text Here</h2>				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://steeltreepartners.com/how-many-carriers-should-i-build-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
